Monthly Archives: February 2009

Bruce Kauffmann Educating consumers about energy and natural gas

A long-standing goal of AGA’s is to better educate the general public about how energy is produced and delivered to the American consumer.

For example, ask most Americans where the electricity they use in their homes comes from and they will respond, “The electric outlets.”  And they are right – sort of, because while it is true that if you plug an electric appliance into an electric outlet, it will receive electric power, that is not where electricity originally comes from.

Electricity originally comes from coal, or natural gas, or from a nuclear power or hydroelectric plant, or – increasingly – from wind or solar energy.  These original sources of energy are then converted into electricity at generation plants and delivered using transmission lines (such as those in the picture accompanying this post) to those aforementioned electric outlets.

090218lines Educating consumers about energy and natural gas

Here is another thing most Americans don’t know.  When the energy source travels from its place of origin – a coal mine in the case of coal, a wellhead in the case of natural gas – to the power plant in which it is converted to electricity, and then on to its ultimate destination at the electric outlet, it has taken a very inefficient journey.  In fact, during that journey around 70 percent of the useable energy is lost.  Most of that loss results from the generation process.

What is more, depending on what fuel is used to generate the electricity, varying amounts of greenhouse gases are released into the atmosphere during the generation process.  That is why, for example, in our new environmentally conscious climate, natural gas is now the preferred fuel for electricity generation.  It is much cleaner than coal; presently it is much more abundant and reliable than wind or solar power; and it is much less controversial than nuclear power.

Of course, in addition to using natural gas to generate electricity to power electric home heaters, water heaters or stoves, natural gas is also used directly to power natural gas home heaters, water heaters or stoves.  And guess what?  This direct use of natural gas in homes or businesses is far more efficient than turning it into electricity for the same purpose – natural gas only loses about 10 percent of its useable energy traveling from the wellhead to the burner tip.  And being more efficient, these direct uses also are more environmentally friendly.  In fact, a typical American home generates twice as many greenhouse gas emissions using an electric resistance water heater than one using a comparable natural gas water heater.

That is why AGA is working to educate more Americans, including our political leaders, about the advantages of the direct use of natural gas. It increases energy efficiency, reduces greenhouse gas emissions and saves consumers money. If you’d like to see how much smaller your carbon footprint would be with increased direct use, go to www.comfortableresponsible.org and check out their carbon calculator. You might be surprised.

Posted in energy | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Dan Gibson Mercedes-Benz looking at compressed natural gas vehicle for U.S.

As I’m constantly looking for stories on natural gas and related materials, I come across quite a few about natural gas as an alternative fuel for vehicles. Usually the story is about someone using natural gas as a fuel source for a fleet of vehicles. Great for the environment.

However, I found this one at leftlanenews.com the other day. Seems Mercedes was showing a compressed natural gas version of its B-Class small car at the recent Washington Auto Show. I didn’t get a chance to get down and see the vehicle. Did anyone else get a chance to see it?

The article goes on to say that Mercedes is strongly considering offering the technology in a U.S.-spec production vehicle and quotes Automotive News as its source.

19009963 Mercedes Benz looking at compressed natural gas vehicle for U.S.

We talk quite a bit around the office about the benefits of natural gas as opposed to other fuels. Here’s a good article on aftermarketcng.com examining some of the environmental benefits of natural gas as opposed to gasoline. Some of the highlights include:

  • Ozone—Reduced tailpipe emission of ozone precursors (NOx and NMHC) On a g/mile basis, average reductions in NOx of 66 percent and 85 percent for NMHC emissions.
  • Carbon monoxide—In normal driving conditions, at least 50 percent reduction in CO emissions and potential for 80-95 percent reductions under conditions like cold temperatures and acceleration.
  • Sulfur Dioxide—Reductions of 90 percent or greater in SO2 emissions.
  • Other gasses associated with global warming—At least 20 percent reduction in tailpipe emissions of global warming gases.
  • Air Toxins—Reductions in air toxic emissions of over 85 percent. Elimination of 1,3 butadiene emissions.
Posted in Natural Gas | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Tom Moskitis House Begins Series of OCS Hearings

The House Committee on Natural Resources began a series of oversight hearings designed to look at our current offshore drilling policy, and to determine where we may need to go next. This first hearing featured a panel of witnesses from environmental groups. Two additional hearings scheduled for later this month will feature witnesses from state governments and the oil and gas production industry.

Opening the hearing yesterday, Committee Chairman Nick Rahall (D-WV) told the environmentalists “I understand your desire to see the (oil and gas leasing) moratoria reinstated. However, we may be in a situation where the ship has already sailed.” Although he derided chants made at last year’s Republican National Convention to “drill, baby, drill,” Rahall stated that “the political reality may be that the moratoria, as we knew it, will not be reimposed.”

This did not sit well with the day’s two star witnesses, actor Ted Danson, a board member of conservationist group Oceana, and Philippe Cousteau, a board member of the Ocean Conservancy and grandson of famed ocean explorer Jacques Cousteau. They repeatedly spoke in opposition to ALL offshore oil and gas development, not just drilling in new areas, on the grounds that the products produced were fossil fuels that, when consumed, would increase the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which is absorbed by the earth’s oceans, which then become more acidic, resulting in the death of all life in the sea. What?  I don’t know about you but this seems like it may be more science fiction than scientific. They were fine with the development of alternative energy on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), such as wind and harnessing tides and currents, so long as no environmental damage is done.

What do you think about all this? I think that with OPEC meeting next month to decide on steps to take to increase the price of oil, our country must aggressively develop all sources of energy, renewable, alternative and conventional. And this most emphatically means more exploration and production of clean natural gas from as much of the federal OCS as possible.

Posted in energy, Natural Gas | Tagged | Comments Off

Tom Moskitis Secretary Salazar takes objective approach to OCS

In an earlier posting I discussed how I was looking forward with cautious optimism toward how our new Secretary of the Interior would act following the expiration of the decades old ban on oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). Secretary Ken Salazar could have come out in favor of reinstating the OCS leasing bans or he could have scrapped the proposed 2010-2015 OCS Oil & Gas Leasing Plan and started over with a new plan.

But he did neither and instead has announced an extension of the comment period for the proposed new plan and a major effort to learn as much as possible about the energy potential of the federal OCS.

At a press conference on February 10, Secretary Salazar announced his strategy for developing an offshore energy plan that includes both conventional and renewable resources. His strategy includes expediting renewable energy rulemaking for the OCS, assembling  a detailed report from Interior agencies on conventional and renewable offshore energy resources and holding, within 30 days of the report’s publication, four regional conferences to review the report’s findings and to seek public comment.

Secretary Salazar will host one meeting in Alaska, one on the Pacific Coast, one on the Atlantic Coast and one on the Gulf Coast (dates and locations TBD.) He has also, as mentioned, extended the comment period on the proposed new 5-Year Plan for oil and gas leasing on the OCS by 180 days, until September 23, 2009. As you may know, one of the last action’s of the Bush Administration was the issuance of a proposed new 5-Year OCS oil and gas leasing plan to run from 2010 till 2015. The proposed plan included a deadline for public comment of March 23.

The Secretary’s action extends that deadline by six months. A copy of the statement from the Department of the Interior can be found here.

I think our Interior Secretary is taking a very objective approach to the OCS and I am encouraged. Secretary Salazar has said that he wants all interested parties to share their recommendations on how to move ahead with a comprehensive offshore energy plan. In that regard, AGA will be commenting on the plan and I urge you to be thinking about sending in comments as well and/or attending and speaking out at one of the upcoming regional conferences.

Posted in energy, Natural Gas | Tagged | Comments Off