Monthly Archives: September 2010

Dan Gibson Yes, natural gas utilites are using social media

When I started my career on the web years ago, more years than I care to admit at this point, I dealt with the criticism from people about websites firsthand. “Websites are just a fad. People aren’t going to use them. Why would anyone read about us on our website; that’s what our newsletter/catalog is for. Hello, have you heard of phone books? No one is going to get our phone number from our website. We don’t even give our employees’ access to the Internet, it’s a waste of time.”

Does any of that sound familiar?

I had the discussions and was able to help people see their website was a valuable communications tool. This thinking became the norm. I moved into a point in my career where I felt comfortable that I’d never have to hear those arguments again. People invested in their websites and built their communications/marketing strategies around them making the website a focal point. You knew that if people wanted to learn about your organization, they were going to start by visiting your website. I no longer had to have the conversation justifying the mere existence of a website. All was right with the world.

Along came the social web

I tell some of the stories now about people in senior management at different organizations I’ve worked with saying that the website was a waste of time and I never fail to get a laugh. People understand how short-sighted that opinion was. They now understand that there was a monumental change happening in the way people got information. Everyone looks back now and it all seems so obvious.

A few years ago, people started doing a little something called blogging. What’s blogging? So it’s just some person in their mom’s basement, right? So what, people leave them comments, big deal. What do you mean when you say community? So forth and so on.

But it didn’t stop with blogging. Along came an entire social world built on the web. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, just to name some of the largest communities. The discussions started again.

“Social media is a fad. No one is going to use social media to learn about our company. What’s a tweet? They’re just talking about what they had for lunch. We block our employees from even using social media, it’s a waste of time.”

Does any of that sound familiar?

Ok, social web got it. But utilities aren’t using them yet, right?

You’ve probably heard about the millions in sales that Dell has generated through twitter, the goodwill  Comcast was able to gain through customer service agents on twitter, or even the success of the Old Spice Guy YouTube channel.  There’s a ton of stories like them. But there probably aren’t any utilities using the social web to engage their customers and expand their communications, right?

Well, let’s just take a quick look at one of my favorite member companies, Atmos Energy. You’ll see why as we walk through this. I visit their homepage looking for information. There’s all the usual great information including a nice toll free number. That’s great but what’s this sitting right smack in the middle of the page. Why it’s a familiar set of social web icons.

Let’s start with their Facebook fan page. I’m greeted with messages about about their company, their people, and their work in the community. I can see conversations between Atmos Energy and that community. Questions, thanks, even complaints or requests for help. There are pictures, video and wall posts that tell Atmos Energy’s story.

Welcome to communication on the social web.

Taking a break to make a point

Here’s the deal. Years ago, you needed the media if you were an organization that wanted to spread your word. You bought the space for the message, crafted the message and distributed the message. People like me that did that for a living will tell you the yellow page ad space was expensive; the company newsletter took weeks to produce so the “news” section really should have been called “old news;” and that expensive shiny brochure was only as good as the mail list that went along with it.

Then along came websites. There’s still a cost, don’t get me wrong but many things changed. You didn’t have to buy ad space. You could communicate with your audience directly, and more importantly, quickly. You didn’t have to wait a week or two for your newsletter to print. You didn’t even have to wait a day for the story to appear in your newspaper. You could publish as rapidly as you needed. And the fear of that tiny mistake missed in blue line that would live forever that would wake you from a sound sleep was gone. You could correct it on the web. Whole new audiences found you on the web. Those people you were missing in your targeted mailings.

Here is what you are missing about the social web. The Atmos Energy Facebook fan page has about a thousand fans. Those are people that are willing to engage with Atmos Energy. Willing to hear their message and have a dialogue back. Those are potential storytellers to spread your message.

That’s the change from the web to the social web. People now share their stories with their social network. Studies are showing that instead of going to a search engine, people are starting to send a quick note to their social networks asking for information. This is what scares Google and why Facebook now sees more traffic than any website, including Google, on Earth.

And it’s not the kids either. In a study by the Pew Internet Research Center, they stated, “Between April 2009 and May 2010, Internet users ages 50-64 who said they use a social networking site like MySpace, Facebook or LinkedIn grew 88% and those ages 65 and older grew 100% in their adoption of the sites, compared with a growth rate of 13% for those ages 18-29.”

That same study goes on to say that, “Social networking use among internet users ages 50 and older has nearly doubled — from 22% to 42% over the past year. Half (47%) of Internet users ages 50-64 and one-in-four (26%) users ages 65 and older now use social networking sites.”

As broad band expands and mobile devices become more popular (think your phone, tablet, iPod Touch, etc.) these numbers are only going to grow.

Back to Atmos Energy

The Atmos Energy twitter account has followers made up of media, partner organizations and customers (I’m assuming here that some of the individuals are their customers but I don’t have access to their customer information to verify this.)  The YouTube community has videos that range from “corporate glossy” to “low-budget” that have been viewed more than 5,000 times.

All of those communities have messaging tailored to the channel and the community around it. Atmos Energy invested real time in building these communities and they will continue to grow over time. Don’t get too caught up in numbers. The numbers aren’t important except that they allow you to keep an eye on trending and growth. The important part is the connection Atmos Energy is establishing with it’s audience.

As you can see, Atmos Energy is fully engaged on the social web. They know what they’re doing and are doing it well.

Posted in Natural Gas | Comments Off

Lydia Meigs National Journal Policy Summit: Energy, Environment and the Economy

Today the American Gas Association (AGA), along with the INGAA Foundation and AGA members CenterPoint Energy and Spectra Energy, hosted a National Journal Policy Summit: Energy, Environment and the Economy.

The examination of innovative solutions for America’s energy future was moderated by journalist Amy Harder, who reports on energy and environment issues for CongressDaily, and moderates National Journal’s Energy Experts blog.  The keynote discussion included Senators Mark Begich (D-AK) and Sam Brownback (R-KS).

Drawing on his familiarity with energy issues from his home state of Alaska, Sen. Begich firmly believes that the fundamental economic and national security issues surrounding a long-term source of domestic and efficient energy are paramount.  He stressed the fact that lower carbon emissions will be an inevitable product of investing in renewable and cleaner sources of fuel.  Begich stated that he is confident everyone is in agreement about the need to move in this direction, but that reaching consensus on the details will be the tricky part.

Sen. Brownback, who serves as Ranking Member of the Energy and Natural Resource Subcommittee on Water and Power, argued that the country’s future energy policy must represent a fine balance among the three E’s: Energy, Economy and Environment.  Calling it a veritable Bermuda triangle, he said that we can only hope the 112th Congress will not lose sight of the horizon.  Brownback also stressed that other countries are already riding the tide of investment in a cleaner energy future and Congress needs to work together in order to craft a successful comprehensive energy policy.

Both senators shared the view that renewable energy sources need to play a significant role in the future of America’s energy portfolio.  Senator Brownback added that these energy sources should be pursued and encouraged within the framework of investment and innovation rather than through taxes and regulation.  They also agreed that passage of an energy bill is possible before the end of 2010.

The panel discussion that followed included David Friedman, Research Director, Union of Concerned Scientists; Gregory Kallenberg, Director and Producer, Haynesville; the Honorable Phil Sharp, President, Resources for the Future and former U.S. Representative (D-IN); Dr. Robert Simon, Majority Staff Director, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources; and Daniel Weiss, Senior Fellow and Director of Climate Strategy, Center for American Progress.

Opinions about the status of various pieces of energy legislation circulating in Congress were mixed, but there was a clear consensus about the importance of addressing the broad energy challenges facing our country.  “The cost may seem high, but if we don’t pay now, we will pay later at a greater cost.  Countries such as China, Japan and South Korea are consciously making the necessary investments in technology to affectively employ cleaner energy sources on a large scale,” said Sharp.

Kallenberg added that the U.S. should look to natural gas, the cleanest fuel available to meet our considerable energy needs, as a part of the solution along with bolstering renewable sources and focusing on efficiency and conservation.

Posted in events | Comments Off

Dan Gibson Traweek testifies before the subcommittee on Energy and Environment

Today the House Committee on Energy and Commerce’s Subcommittee on Energy & Environment held a hearing on Pipeline Safety & Oversight. AGA’s COO, Lori Traweek testified. You can watch the testimony or read the full transcript of Lori’s testimony over at the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment website but I’ll start it off here.

Good morning, Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee. My name is Lori Traweek and I am the senior vice president and chief operating officer for the American Gas Association (AGA). AGA represents 195 local energy companies that deliver natural gas throughout the United States.

Let me first say, our hearts go out to those who are suffering and have lost loved ones and homes as a result of the tragic natural gas explosion in San Bruno, CA. Any natural gas incident, no matter the size, is one incident too many. For that reason, AGA and its member utilities are committed to fostering best practices and engaging in industry dialogue with all key stakeholders to advance safe operations. As I speak, senior executives and safety leaders from gas utilities around the country are meeting at our fourth annual AGA Executive Safety Leadership Summit to discuss how the natural gas industry can improve pipeline safety, along with the safety of our employees, contractors and our customers. We also held our semi-annual operations technical committee meetings this week to address issues related to corrosion control, gas control, and a variety of pipeline and employee safety issues. Not surprisingly, the San Bruno tragedy was a focus of the conversations. We hold these forums because, first and foremost, the industry’s goal is to safely, reliably and efficiently deliver natural gas to the more than 70 million customers in the United States who rely on natural gas for their energy needs. When there is a tragic incident like this, similar to Congress, the regulators and the public, we too want to determine what could have been done to prevent the incident and then take appropriate actions to prevent a reoccurrence.

The utilities that deliver the natural gas are subject not only to their own stringent internal controls, but also must meet rigorous federal and state oversight — and the safety of the public is, and always will remain, our industry’s paramount priority.

The natural gas industry operates an extensive 2.4 million miles of distribution and transmission pipelines that stretches across the country. The industry spends an estimated $7 billion each year in safety-related activities…[read Lori's full testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment]

Posted in energy | Tagged | Comments Off

Dan Gibson Day one of the marketing/communications meeting is in the books

Day one of the marketing and communications meeting is over and I’m exhausted. It was a full day. We’re doing the meeting along with the Operations meeting so there are more than 600 attendees here. Quite a crowd.

The day was chocked full of events so I’ll give you a quick run down. We started with a policy and energy update from Kevin Book. Kevin is a leading energy expert and the Managing Director of Research at Clearview Energy Partners. Lori came in and gave our group an update from the executive committee. Mary Usovicz from Repsol Energy North America gave us something to think about in her Marketing Natural Gas 101 presentation which was a natural spring board to “Natural Gas Branding” from the folks at Council for Responsible Energy. The group did breakout discussions by region talking about some of the challenges and opportunities they’re facing. Good reports out of this session.

The afternoon started with “Win-Win Collections” from Americollect CEO Kenlyn Gretz. Eric Burgis from Energy Solutions Center followed that showing us some of the excellent resouces available from his organization. Gary Swan and Sunny Dent from the National Energy Foundation closed the day’s sessions with a great “Lingo” game. Evening receptions and dinner and, bam, it’s 10:30 and time for bed for Dan after a quick call home.

The presentations were excellent but one of my favorites was Kevin Book’s analysis of the current state of policy in DC and his thoughts on where it might lead. Some bullets from his first slide:

Where We Are

  • The “Fuel Fight”
  • The Zone of No Accountability
  • The Moratorium … and Risk That Washes Ashore
  • After “Big Climate”

What to Watch

  • Likely: Tax policy reforms
  • Likely: Limited GOM throughput
  • Possible: Fracking policy changes: Pavilion and Pennsylvania
  • Improbable: Sweeping “spill policy”
  • Next year: Emissions Policy at the Core

You can download the full “Policy, Politics and Energy Update” presentation here. If you’re in Boston, let us know what you think of the event.

100922 daily catch 01 Day one of the marketing/communications meeting is in the books

On my way to dinner towards the end of a full day.

Posted in events | 1 Comment