Author Archives: Richard Meyer

Richard Meyer IEA Study: Natural Gas Supplies Will Continue To Grow Globally

Natural gas supplies are growing globally and demand for this low-carbon resource will continue to grow, according to a new report.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) recently released its annual World Energy Outlook, a comprehensive study that examines global energy markets, as well as the policies and market dynamics that shape the supply and demand trajectory of oil, coal, gas, nuclear and renewable resources. The IEA models a number of different market and policy scenarios to report projections of energy markets by country and sector.

The study found that natural gas demand grows no matter what scenario is examined. The robustness of the global natural gas resource, and the multitude of diverse uses for natural gas, leads to increased usage. Greater natural gas consumption in buildings, power generation and industrial usage, and as a transportation fuel, leads researchers to believe that natural gas will overtake oil to be the largest fuel in the domestic energy mix in 2030.

The global energy map is changing, spurred by a resurgence of natural gas and oil production in the United States. New technology has unlocked the potential for shale in North America and shifted our country’s global energy position from a net importer to a potential exporter.

A recent analysis by the U.S. Department of Energy indicates that U.S. exports of natural gas would allow for continued stable pricing for the 177 million Americans who depend on the safe and reliable delivery of natural gas every day, which is a priority for AGA and its members. The IEA study states that, “[Un]conventional gas accounts for nearly half the increase in global gas production to 2035.” However, the uncertainty of future supplies in international markets where shale development is in its nascent phase is noted.

IEA has positive news for renewable energy as well. By 2035, renewables will account for one-third of total electricity output globally, a result of a steady increase in hydropower and rapid growth in solar and wind. Energy efficiency will play a key role as well.

End-use matters. How we use a fuel and what fuel we use are the most important factors in reducing emissions. According to new data on global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), carbon dioxide – principally from fossil fuel combustion – is the most important GHG emitted by human activities. It accounts for 85 percent of the warming over the last decade. Yet of all fossil fuels, natural gas is the least carbon-dioxide intensive. Greater natural gas use in place of other fossil fuels reduces emissions.

Our country needs to focus on optimizing our natural gas resources, recognizing the benefits of increased use in homes, businesses, power generation, industrial plants and vehicles. A home with natural gas emits 37 percent less GHG than a house with all electricity and spends 30 percent less on energy. Increased use in the transportation sector decreases greenhouse gas emissions—by 29 percent compared to gasoline powered vehicles—and increases our national energy security by decreasing our reliance on oil imports from less stable nations.

Furthermore, investments need to continue to be made to help improve our pipeline infrastructure to further reduce emissions and continue to lay the groundwork – quite literally – for new and more efficient uses of our gas resources. The potential is significant.

Natural gas can affordably meet the energy requirements of the country and the globe as part of a diversified energy mix. The savings, combined with increased trade and additional jobs will help grow our economy.

The IEA says the resource is here to stay. Let’s make sure we use it right.

Posted in energy, Natural Gas, people, technology | 1 Comment

Richard Meyer Typical natural gas households emit 44 percent less greenhouse gases than an all-electric

When we think about building newer, greener households, there is a tendency to focus on the house going all electric. After all, if a house does not burn any fossil fuels, it follows that the carbon footprint of the household should be zero, right?

This kind of carbon accounting, however, fails to include any greenhouse gas emissions that occurred prior to the point of consumption. When you use electricity to watch TV or heat your home, the energy was generated from an “upstream” fuel source. This generation and subsequent transmission to your house means that every time you turn on a light, there could be associated greenhouse gas emissions.

Let’s look at the U.S. electricity mix. In 2011, more than 42 percent of all electric energy was generated from coal, the most carbon-intensive fossil fuel used for electric generation. Natural gas, which has a lighter greenhouse gas footprint, represents 20 percent of the electric energy generated last year. The remaining generation came from nuclear (19 percent), hydroelectric (8 percent), and renewables like solar and wind (less than 5 percent). But what does this mean for greenhouse gas emissions related to home energy use?

In a recent report, Squeezing Every BTU, we tried to calculate exactly what the greenhouse gas impact of a typical new home might be. The Policy Analysis team here at AGA modeled an “average” household by calculating what energy would be required to heat the home, for water heating, for cooking and for clothes drying. We assumed an average sized home in a moderate climate, and the appliances all met the minimum standards for efficiency. For the electric home, we assumed the house used an electric heat pump for its winter heating needs.

The next step was to calculate the amount of fuel required to meet these energy requirements. We considered natural gas, electricity, fuel oil and propane. The final step calculated the greenhouse gas impact from this fuel usage. We made sure to include all “upstream” emissions from the production of the primary fuel to its transportation (truck, rail, pipeline), as well as any emissions associated with electric generation, and eventually emissions related to the final delivery to the consumer.

By combining all the upstream source emissions with the end-use fuel consumption, we were able to evaluate the full-fuel-cycle impact of a typical household’s energy requirements on greenhouse gas emissions. This is what we found.

Typical natural gas households graph1 Typical natural gas households emit 44 percent less greenhouse gases than an all electric

Full-fuel-cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a Typical Household Fuel used for space heating, water heating, cooking, and clothes drying

On average, a typical household using natural gas performs the best. The natural gas household modeled had four percent fewer greenhouse gas emissions compared with an all-electric household. Compared to fuel oil and propane respectively, the natural gas household emitted 27 percent and 16 percent fewer greenhouse gases, . The figure above captures the total amount of greenhouse gases associated with using the specified energy source for space heating, water heating, cooking, and clothes drying, as measured in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per household per year

The bottom line is that the direct use of natural gas is and should be seen as a carbon mitigation tool. Replacing less efficient and more carbon intensive equipment with high efficiency natural gas can lead to substantial decreases in greenhouse gases. With natural gas prices dropping, consumers can save money and reduce their carbon footprint by using natural gas directly in the home.

For more on this and other market and policy issues related to the direct use of natural gas, see AGA’s recent report Squeezing Every BTU: Natural Gas Direct Use Opportunities and Challenges.

Posted in energy | 5 Comments

Richard Meyer Natural Gas Market Indicators

Mild temperatures have trumped all other market conditions this winter, even with a flattening of production growth for the first time in five years. Short-term gas demand for residential and commercial heating has lessened and gas-to-power burn has dropped from the higher volumes seen in mid-February. Ratcheting requirements could still pull more gas from storage into a market that is already awash in supply, but the demand equation, and ultimately supply-demand balance in the market, will be a function of how quickly winter recedes and spring arrives.

Visit this link to download the full Natural Gas Market Indicators.  Topics covered include: Reported Prices, Weather, Working Gas in Underground Storage, Shale Gas, Rig Counts, Pipeline Imports and Exports, and LNG Markets.

Posted in energy | 1 Comment

Richard Meyer American Energy Driving Job Growth

Some optimistic economic news emerging this week.

From the Bureau of Labor Statistics, this month’s job report shows U.S. payrolls gained 243,000 jobs in January, and the unemployment rate dropped to 8.3%.  The decreasing unemployment rate is one more indicator that Americans are finding jobs and getting back to work.  In fact, newly revised data shows the U.S. created 1.82 million jobs in 2011.  This is good news for a U.S. economic recovery.

Contributing, in part, to the job growth over the last few years has been the booming energy industry here at home.  See the chart below.  The blue line represents total employment in oil and gas extraction, and the shaded areas indicate periods of recession.

 American Energy Driving Job Growth

Oil and gas extraction employment has added 67,700 jobs since 2003, a 57 percent increase.  After a slowdown in job additions during the 2007-2009 recession, as there were in other sectors of the economy, oil and gas extraction employment is once again growing, and at increasing pace since 2010.

And remember, these are direct jobs as classified by the BLS.  Direct jobs in turn create other employment opportunities in other sectors – called indirect jobs – which prompts new spending and new job creation yet again – these are induced effects.  Therefore, the full economic and employment effect goes beyond just the direct jobs represented here.  (See the America’s Natural Gas Alliance jobs report for more).

When you add up all the jobs from cleaner energy technologies, including renewables, biofuels, natural gas and others, the positive effect on American is apparent.

Posted in energy | 5 Comments