Coming Down To Earth on a ‘Clean Energy’ Standard?
Read my latest response on the National Journal’s Energy and Environment Experts blog to the question, “Should Congress Embrace A ‘Clean Energy’ Standard?”
AGA has long supported, to the fullest extent possible, the development of a diverse domestic energy supply, including coal, oil, nuclear, wind, hydro, solar and, of course, natural gas. Senator Graham’s proposal, while an important first step, does not fully engage all of America’s low-carbon tools in our fight to reduce carbon emissions; specifically, it omits natural gas. As Energy Secretary Steven Chu recently told us at an AGA Board of Directors meeting, natural gas is a necessary component of any truly renewable energy program.
The fact remains that all of the power produced by alternative and renewable fuel sources meets only a small portion of the country’s daily energy needs, and those dependent on solar and wind to produce electricity rely on natural gas as a back-up fuel when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine. A realistic plan for a low-carbon future, therefore, must include, and support, traditional and proven fuel sources such as natural gas.
With major energy producers publicly turning to natural gas as their fuel of choice, the message is clear – as the cleanest of all fossil fuels, natural gas can provide the nation and its consumers with a proven, reliable, low-carbon source of energy.
Equally important is ensuring that the most effective and efficient application of natural gas – its direct use in the home for space heating, heating water, cooking, and other end-use applications – is encouraged and supported. Direct use of natural gas is by far the most efficient, cost effective and green choice when compared to converting gas to electricity to power the same end-use applications.
The best way to address climate change and support the renewable market, while still providing America with the reliable energy it needs to grow its economy, is with a wide-ranging set of options that includes natural gas and all of America’s other energy resources.
Other posts that might interest you:
- Coming Down To Earth, A Winning Strategy For Renewables
- How Can The U.S. Wean Itself Off Oil: Diversity Breeds Strength
- The Natural Gas Revolution
Comments
2 Comments on Coming Down To Earth on a ‘Clean Energy’ Standard?
-
Fred Kesinger on
Sat, 27th Feb 2010 2:58 pm
-
Mark Mobley on
Sat, 15th May 2010 5:28 am
Any viable U.S. Energy policy for the next few decades must include a combination of:
1. Consumption, Conservation and energy efficiency
2. Fossil Fuels-Oil, natural gas and clean coal
3. Nuclear
4. Renewables-wind, solar, ocean, biofuels, etc.
5. Geothermal, hydro, etc.
[Reply]
Well put article.
Natural Gas needs to position itself as the viable transition to a clean environment. We also need to position Natural Gas away from the theory of Fossil Fuel and the other similar fuels.
[Reply]
Tell us what you're thinking...and don't forget you can check the 'Notify me of followup comments via e-mail' box under the submit button. If you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!
RSS Feed





