Chris McGill Natural gas market indicators

090513ngmi Natural gas market indicators

Recent prices for natural gas have strengthened but it hasn’t occurred in a vacuum. World oil prices have led the way on expectations of global economic improvements in late 2009 and 2010. An overall review of current U.S. gas supply shows a curve that is beginning to indicate a downward trend; however, most of the change has come in the form of import reductions from Canada. Domestic production declines will happen as time passes given reductions in drilling activity and budgets – that is a fact.

What is unknown is how rapidly the large volume market for industrial consumption of natural gas will rebound. With that said, many analysts believe that the market price for natural gas still has room at the bottom to fall given high storage inventories, lackluster demand and a relatively strong supply position compared to potential summer demand.

Visit this link to download the full Natural Gas Market Indicator. Topics covered include: Reported Prices, Weather, Working Gas in Underground Storage, Natural Gas Production, Rig Counts, Pipeline Imports and Exports, and LNG Markets.

Posted in Natural Gas | Tagged | 1 Comment

Kristin Schrader Marcell Obama budget could impact future domestic energy supplies

I’ve been reading quite a few stories in the news recently covering President Obama’s final fiscal 2010 federal budget proposal and the impact that the new taxes and other provisions could have on future domestic energy supplies.

Earlier this year, the American Gas Association (AGA) issued a release on the President’s proposed budget, which details AGA’s concerns about the budget’s potential negative impact on natural gas customers through higher energy prices. It looks like we’re not alone on this.

090511pullquotebudget Obama budget could impact future domestic energy supplies

Here’s a story from the New York Times where John Felmy, chief economist at the American Petroleum Institute, says the impact of the budget on the industry will be to raise taxes on producers. The concern then being that most of this impact will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher fuel costs.

The Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States believes that the budget tax increases are most harmful to small American energy companies that produce the clean, affordable and abundant American natural gas that we need to increase energy security, make renewable energy sources viable, and address climate change.

In another story from the Oil and Gas Journal, Barry Russell, the president of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, says that the budget “does not recognize that in order to decrease our reliance on foreign oil, we need to increase our own American supplies of natural gas and oil.”

These are just a few of the articles I came across. Many are concerned that the President’s budget would make it harder to develop America’s domestic natural resources by repealing existing tax provisions that encourage American production, as well as creating new excise taxes on offshore production and new user fees that will add to the overly complex and costly permit process.

By discouraging the production of America’s cleanest-burning, domestically abundant fossil fuel, this budget could ultimately tighten domestic supplies of natural gas; therefore, causing financial burden on consumers through higher energy prices, higher monthly natural gas bills, and higher unemployment through the loss of well-paying American jobs.

After reading those articles, are you concerned?

Posted in energy, Natural Gas | Tagged | 1 Comment

Kristin Schrader Marcell Waxman-Markey: Tweak It Or Overhaul It?

nationaljournalblog2 Waxman Markey: Tweak It Or Overhaul It?
Recently, Dave Parker participated in the National Journal’s Energy and Environment Experts blog to respond to their question, “Waxman-Markey: Tweak It Or Overhaul It?” Please take a moment to visit the National Journal Energy Experts blog to see his response as well as the comments from others in this respected group.

Posted in energy | Tagged | Comments Off

Roger Cooper How Much Natural Gas Does the U.S. Have

Recently the Heritage Foundation posted an article on cap and trade on their blog. In the article, they talk about the potential of natural gas supply. I left a comment there and thought the information might be useful for anyone considering the same question. My thoughts on the article appear below.

Many people have heard conflicting numbers regarding the supply of natural gas in the United States. Most everyone who knows about U.S. natural gas supply would agree that the U.S. has abundant supplies of natural gas. So why the confusion? It’s because the natural gas industry uses different numbers, for different reasons, to describe supply. My bottom line: Someday the U.S. may stop using natural gas because something better may come along. But when that happens, I believe there will still be huge quantities of natural gas lying beneath U.S. lands and waters.

10 Years of Supply: Sometimes people are referring to “proved reserves” of natural gas. The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s latest estimate of proved reserves of dry natural gas in the U.S. is 237,726 billion cubic feet – enough to supply current U.S. demand for about 10 years. http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/data_publications/crude_oil_natural_gas_reserves/current/pdf/table01.pdf

Proved reserves look something like inventory, what you have discovered and know you can produce if you go ahead and drill it. The U.S. usually has around 8 to 10 years of proved reserves.

80 Years of Supply: Another way of looking at natural gas supply is to look at the U.S. natural gas resource base. The natural gas resource base can mean all natural gas that exists or, more commonly, all natural gas that is currently technically recoverable. Technical recovery also usually implies that the gas can be recovered economically. This is where we see the big differences in numbers. The 2007 report of the Potential Gas Committee of the Colorado School of Mines determined that in 2006 the U.S. had a natural gas resource base of 1,525 Trillion cubic feet of natural in the U.S. (about an 82 year supply).

Thousands of Years of Supply: Does this mean that in 82 years we will run out of natural gas? No. It means that with today’s technologies and in today’s market we may have an 82 year supply. But there are mind-numbing quantities of natural gas that we do not count today. It is likely that the next report of the Potential Gas Committee will find that we now have much more natural gas because of the relatively recent perfection of drilling technologies that will allow the production of huge quantities of U.S. natural gas from shale. But even gas from shale may be a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering quantities of frozen natural gas that are in and around the United States. This is regular natural gas that is frozen because it is under pressure in the waters of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf. This frozen natural gas is called methane hydrates or methane clathrates and we currently do not have the technologies in place to produce this natural gas from the OCS. However, methane hydrates are also found in Alaska and northern Canada beneath the permafrost. Recently experimental wells have been drilled and some natural gas from methane hydrates have been produced with today’s technologies.

When you look at natural gas from methane hydrates, the numbers are staggering. It has often been said that the energy from the methane hydrates in the U.S. vastly exceed the energy found in all the coal, oil and conventional natural gas in the U.S. combined. One estimate of U.S. methane hydrates is 200,000 Trillion cubic feet – close to 9,000 years of supply at current U.S. consumption levels.

So how much natural gas do we have in the United States? The realistic answer depends on technology and economics.

http://www.mrs.org/s_mrs/bin.asp?CID=12527&DID=208645

http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/methane_hydrates/MHydrate_overview_06-2007.pdf

Posted in energy, Natural Gas | Tagged | 4 Comments