Dan Gibson Clean Cities Success Story: New York Sanitation using compressed natural gas

Clean Cities is a government-industry partnership sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE)’s Vehicle Technologies Program. With almost 90 local coalitions and more than 5,700 stakeholders, Clean Cities’ mission is to reduce petroleum consumption in the transportation sector. We’ve written about Clean Cities a few times in the past.

They have a new section of videos showcasing alternative fuels (think compressed natural gas) and advanced vehicles. They’ve had great segments on Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and the city of Kansas City already. Here’s another good one on the New York City department of sanitation.



The New York City Department of Sanitation has the nation’s largest municipal refuse fleet. That fleet includes a ton of vehicles using alternative fuels including hybrid electric and natural gas powered refuse trucks. They don’t stop there though.

NYC’s 2,000 other diesel refuse trucks run on renewable B5 biodiesel as do 450 of their street sweepers. Compressed natural gas fuels another 25 and the alt-fuel list also includes hundreds of light duty gasoline-electric hybrids used by field supervisors along with 6 all-electric GEMs that move around the repair shop.

The fleet has a big job in collecting 22 million pounds of garbage daily, so it’s nice to see them keeping it “clean and green.”

You can view the video above or hop on over to the Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center Web site for more. Be sure to visit the AGA YouTube channel if you’re looking for more great natural gas videos.

Posted in Natural Gas | Tagged , | Comments Off

Bruce Kauffmann Natural gas is efficient, don’t let your energy melt away

091028.icecream.small Natural gas is efficient, dont let your energy melt awayImagine that you bought an ice cream cone — say, two scoops of Rocky Road with sprinkles on a vanilla cone, costing you $2.70 — and you then decided to walk the mile to your home and eat your ice cream cone there.   So you put the ice cream cone in your backpack, trek home and pull it out to eat, only to discover that two-thirds of it has melted.   In essence, you paid $2.70 for about 90 cents worth of ice cream.

Not a smart decision, but it illustrates a point with respect to energy use.   Using electric appliances in your home, be it an electric water heater, heat pump or stove, is a lot like that ice cream cone.  From the point of origin, whether it’s a coal mine or a natural gas well, to the place where either of them is generated into electricity — usually a central station power plant — to the electric outlet in your home, electricity loses about two-thirds of its useable energy.   Most of that energy loss occurs in the generation process.

By contrast, natural gas’ journey from the wellhead through transmission and distribution pipelines directly to the natural gas furnace, boiler, fireplace or stove in the home loses only about 10 percent of its usable energy.  Thus natural gas is far more efficient than electricity.

Read the rest of the story

Posted in Natural Gas | Tagged | Comments Off

Chris Hogan Drilling For A Compromise?

nationaljournalblog2 Drilling For A Compromise? The National Journal’s Energy and Environment Experts blog asked a series of thought-provoking questions in a post titled “Drilling for a compromise?” You can read Dave Parker’s response below and follow this link to see what the other experts had to say.

We cannot discuss the issue of domestic oil development in a vacuum because natural gas development is part of that story. That said, the short answer is yes, any legislation should include provisions to encourage domestic oil development. And it is not only the oil and natural gas industry that supports domestic production. Developing a reliable and home-grown energy supply is also a vital part of our national security. Many citizens of the states in which it would occur strongly support increasing domestic oil—and natural gas—production because they recognize both the importance of developing home-grown energy options and, especially now, the financial benefit to their states in the form of leasing royalties and jobs. However, politics and the politics of fear—specifically baseless claims about the environmental and safety threats posed by domestic production—habitually frustrate the efforts of those who wish to take action to reduce America’s dependence on foreign energy.

America’s onshore and offshore oil and natural gas production has an exceptional record of safety and environmental stewardship. There has not been a single significant oil or natural gas spill from a production rig for more than 40 years, including in the Gulf of Mexico during Hurricane Katrina! Domestic production also reduces America’s overall carbon footprint because, in addition to natural gas being the cleanest fossil fuel on the planet, local production of oil would reduce the demand for foreign drilling, storage and transportation via enormous tankers, all of which make significant contributions to carbon output.

Finally, the best way to address climate change, while still providing America with the energy it needs to grow its economy, is with a wide-ranging set of options, which is why AGA has long supported, to the fullest extent possible, the development of a diverse domestic energy supply, including oil, nuclear, wind, hydro, solar and, of course, domestic, abundant and clean natural gas.

Accessing and utilizing natural gas, and all of America’s other energy resources, is a key piece to solving the energy, energy security and climate change puzzle. But it is also important to note that increased fuel diversity would also allow more natural gas to be used directly in the residential and commercial market, where, for more than 40 years, natural gas customers have led the way in increasing energy efficiency and conservation, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Posted in energy | Comments Off

Chris McGill Natural gas market indicators

091125.ngmi  Natural gas market indicators

What did not happen in the United States over the summer – production declines led by a falling rig count and lower demand – actually did materialize to our north, in Canada.

According to Barclays Capital, increases in Canadian unconventional drilling have been insufficient to offset a falling rig count, and production is expected to decline both this year and next.  United States production remained flat or increased (led by shale), while LNG imports and imports from Canada moderated or declined compared to historical values.

These factors suggest that the “supply stack” in the United States is led by shale and offshore supplies, followed in a distant second by Canadian and LNG imports.  As we have all heard in recent months, it really is all about shale gas.

Visit this link to download the full Natural Gas Market Indicator. Topics covered include: Reported Prices, Weather, Working Gas in Underground Storage, Natural Gas Production, Rig Counts, Pipeline Imports and Exports, and LNG Markets.

Posted in Natural Gas | Tagged | Comments Off